Annotated Contents

 

Actual columns follow the annotated contents

 

 

 

January 7, 2000        Benazir’s Betrayal

This is Benazir's second year on the North American lecture circuit. It was reported that last year she earned US$200,000 from her twenty lectures. With such a start, Benazir's new career looks rather promising. But this should not come as a surprise to anyone, for she has the right qualifications. But what a fall for a woman of such fortunate background!

January 21, 2000      Society without Parallel

 

Contemporary America is not the best model human beings have evolved in history. But  it’s a society which has managed to remain vibrant and creative.

 

February 4, 2000      Dew on Sunburnt Roses

 

The agenda for change has failed to emerge. The euphoria created by the ouster of Mian Nawaz Sharif by the military has quietly disappeared from the national scene and it is business as usual, once again.

 

February 16, 2000   Collapse of Institutions

 

When all is said and done, Pakistan’s multiple problems arise from a simple cause -failure to build solid institutions. We started out with institutions left behind by the British and instead of transforming them or evolving new ones, all we have done in the last fifty-two years is to destroy what was bequeathed to us as a legacy of our colonial past.

 

March 3, 2000          Twenty Miles from Pakistan

 

Built on a scale which reminds one of the Mughal dynasties, medieval ages and grand empires, the Presidency recedes into the hills from its imposing front view at the intersection of Constitution Avenue and Jinnah Avenue.

 

March 17, 2000        The Last Pilgrimage

 

It was a glorious Thursday. The date was May 28, 632 (Rabi ul-awwal 12, 11 Hijri). It was also a sad day for the Muslim community, for on this day, the Prophet of Islam departed from this world.

 

March 31, 2000        Haj year 2000

 

We had gathered from all corners of the world. Thousands upon thousands. Men, women, children, old, young, strong and weak. Responding to the urgent invitation, we all submitted: “Here I am, O Lord, Here I am…”

 

April 14, 2000

 

Another Political Void

 

Six months after the historic October 12 day, we are in the midst of a political void. The law of necessity had demanded the creation of this void, expediency had required the removal of all political elements from the scene, and instinct of survival had dictated the mechanisms.

 

May 1, 2000  Glimpses of a Distorted Culture

 

…This is how hundreds of madrassah students start their school day across the country. Their repetition, their drudgery and their unchanging curricula were formulated at the height of decadence of Muslim culture. Things have not changed in centuries.

 

Mar 12, 2000            Do we need more science?

 

Five years ago, on a cold March day, Professor Syed Hussein Nasr delivered a keynote address in Islamabad on the subject of science. The bottom line of his address was a clear warning to the Muslim world on the subject of modern science. The western scientific enterprise requires a very careful analysis and not a blind imitation.

 

May 26, 2000                        Time is running out

 

The coincidence of dates and the number of judges leads us to a grand finale marked for October 12, 2002 – the day when the three-year term of General Pervez Mussarraf will come to an end.

 

June 10, 2000           The Numbers Game

 

If we are to believe our worthy science minister, Pakistan will surely be a world economic power within a few years.  But before we jump to any conclusions, let us get our facts straight.

 

June 23          A forgotten Pakistani

 

It was a cold and cloudy day of April 2000. I had walked up the long road high above the historic city of Granada to a small Muslim cemetery. I had gone there to pay homage to a Pakistani whose hundredth birthday will not be celebrated in Pakistan on July 2 this year. His name was Muhammad Asad.

 

July 7, 2000   The ‘Oh, I See’ Joke

 

The June 27th meeting of the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) Foreign Ministers’ (ICFM) meeting at Kuala Lumpur did what OIC has been doing since 1969: passed an enormous number of resolutions.

 

July 21, 2000 Recalling Islamic Clauses

 

The connection between the chief executive’s promulgation and the train blast is clear: while a statement from the country’s ruler proclaims Islam to be the state religion, a section of population negates, violates and contradicts the very spirit of Islam by taking lives of innocent people and by showing how helpless the rulers are in real life.

 

August 4, 2000          Recolonisation of the World

 

Ahmae sits in front of his computer screen in a small room on one of Lahore’s posh areas. He stares at the small programme file he has written in Java script. Soon the file would be uploaded to a server in California where this small part of a huge software programme would fit nicely into its proper place.

 

August 18, 2000       Missing national Agenda

 

As individuals, we should rise above the rosy dreams of a utopia modeled after the western prosperity. We should realise that the only purpose this technology can serve for a Muslim is to put enough money in his pocket to enable him to live freely.

 

September 1, 2000              Flip side of IT policy

 

For the weary reader, the title of this column may sound like a diatribe  … After all, who would dare to write against the virtual reality, for that is the only reality we know in this

age of collective amnesia.

 

September 15, 2000                        Muslims in the 21st Century - I

 

Not a single leader from the fifty-six Muslim countries at the recent UN meeting in New York could stand out as a leader of a country whose voice could not be ignored. These leaders claimed to represent more than one billion Muslims!

 

September 29, 2000                        Muslims in the 21st Century – II

 

Look at a contemporary map and you will ind a densely populated region of Asia, Africe and the Middle East where most of the 56 Muslim states are situated. These lands have been the traditional home of Muslims for centuries. Today, almost all of these ancient lands are at the bottom of the economic indicators.

 

October 13, 2000     Western Media’s Biases

 

The images shown on the TV and news media of the 12 year-old boy and his father sitting in front of a wall a Netzarim of Saturday, September 30, the volley of bullets, the agonizing cries, the shouts for help and the death of the boy produces no outrage in the West. No one paid more than a fleeting attention to this violence.

 

October 27, 2000 Profanity around the Haram – unpublished

 

Today, Hajj and Umrah have become a multi-million dollar business. The two peak seasons are the Ramadan and the Hajj when are many as two million people come to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

 

November 10, 2000             Islam, Science and Muslims

 

The familiar cliche about science in Pakistan come in many different versions: “We need science for development”; “If we do not have enough science, we will be left behind in the race for progress”; “We do not spend enough on science”. These and similar slogans have been making headlines all over the Muslim world for almost a century now.

 

November 24, 2000             A Friday in Jerusalem

 

It was the fourth Friday after the notorious visit of Ariel Sharon to Islam’s third holiest site, a visit that had left more than 260 people dead in its wake. Shortly after arrival in Jerusalem, we had rushed through the deserted streets of the Old City and were able to enter the Mosque for Isha prayer.

 

December 11, 2000             The Undemocratic Alliance

 

It is a cruel and crude joke and no one is ready to listen to it anymore. What is needed is a national plan to tackle the very basic issues. The need is for a national alliance for the restoration of human dignity, quality of life and basic infrastructure, not for the restoration of a caricature of democracy  which will bring more destruction and corruption and misery.

 

December 22, 2000             Making Eid a Global Affair

 

Will we have two Eids again? Every year Pakistan, and many other Muslim countries go through this experience of moon controversy. It is one of those perpetual controversies that is never resolved.

 

 

           

                       

The News International

Friday  Jan. 7, 2000

 

Benazir's betrayal

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

"Former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto's story is one of hope, perseverance and survival as she guided the people of Pakistan from anarchy to the restoration of democracy while confined to prison," reads the quarter page advertisement in a Canadian newspaper. "Despite her many years of political imprisonment, the witnessing of the hanging of her father and the mysterious death of her brother, Benazir Bhutto continued to wage a relentless struggle for freedom. Benazir Bhutto faced oppression with courage and determination and went on to become the second prime minister ever to have been elected to the office twice and the first woman to govern an Islamic country. Come meet this remarkable world leader and visionary."

The date is May 9, 2000. The city is Edmonton, Alberta. Three other women will speak in the four-part lecture series called "Unique Lives & Experiences". The website for the series (www.uniquelives.com) provides very little information to identify the organisation which has planned the event. This is what they say:

"Unique Lives & Experiences, North America's foremost women's lecture series, was developed in response to women's requests for intellectual entertainment and provides them with a forum for meaningful dialogue and stimulating interaction. Unique Lives & Experiences is a very special, multi-evening lecture series designed to motivate, challenge and enlighten anyone with a strong desire to learn from the personal experiences of our distinguished speakers. And, if you want to share the experience, an exciting Question & Answer period will give you the chance to speak your mind."

The other speakers in the series are an Olympic rower, Silken Laumann, who is called "a Canadian sports legend", a comic strip writer, Lynn Johnston, who created the chronicle of the Patterson family in "For better or for worse", and an Oscar and Emmy Award winner, Patty Duke, who will speak "with openness and courage about living with manic depression".

The series packages for all four performances start from $109, VIP series ticket is $308, which entitles you to "VIP Orchestra seating, followed by a private reception with the guest speaker". This is Benazir's second year on the North American lecture circuit. It was reported that last year she earned US$200,000 from her twenty lectures. With such a start, Benazir's new career looks rather promising. But this should not come as a surprise to anyone, for she has the right qualifications. But what a fall for a woman of such fortunate background!

Glimpses of her life are full of dramatic moments. She was born on a hot June day in 1953 in a house on McNeill Road, Karachi, which had been named Be-Nazir (without equal, incomparable) by her grandfather. Benazir Bhutto did not see her father until she was six months old. At that time he was studying in England and only returned to Karachi toward the end of the year. First child born to Nusrat, the second wife of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Benazir was so pink at birth that her aunt called her "Pinkie", a name that would be with her for the rest of her life.

Eighteen years later, Benazir flew from Cambridge to be with her father as he delivered that historic speech in the Security Council, a speech so full of empty bravado that one shudders to read the fateful words: "We will fight for a thousand years…you want us to lick the dust. We are not going to lick the dust…I am not a rat. I have never ratted in my life…I am leaving your Security Council. I find it disgraceful to my person and my country to remain here a moment longer…my country beckons me…"

That was December 15, 1971. Two days later Zulfikar Ali Bhutto flew to Key Biscane, Florida, to meet Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger on Bebe Rebozo's yacht. They assured him of ample US support and when he arrived home on the 20th of December, the presidency of the country awaited him.

The next dramatic glimpse of Benazir's life appears on June 21, 1972, her nineteenth birthday. She had flown from Lahore with her father and ninety-two others to Simla, the summer capital of the British Raj and now the capital of India's Himachal Pradesh. On the fourth day of the summit, when a deadlock had set in, Bhutto and Indira Gandhi were locked in a room to hammer out a solution. It was left to Benazir to run the stairs from her upstairs bedroom to follow the progress of the talks.

After this eventful trip to India, there are many-faceted glimpses of her life, crowded into the short span of seven years. During this time, Pinkie saw the rise of her father's fortune. She witnessed the rise and fall of several associates, who were once her father's dear friends and who were discarded by him without much consideration. Her loyalty to her father remained unflinching.

And then there was the fateful day of April 3, 1979 when she was taken out of her Sihala's Police "Camp" and driven to Rawalpindi for a final meeting with her father. She could not believe it. "No, the scream burst through the knots of my throat," she wrote later, "Papa! Papa! I felt cold, so cold, in spite of the heat, and couldn't stop shaking. There was nothing my mother and I could say to console each other…"

Thereafter, her life is shrouded in mystery. Long years in solitary confinement, dark days. Hopelessness, fears, uncertainty and finally exile. But then came August 17, 1988, a day when fortunes turned and Benazir suddenly found herself out of the dark alleys. The fatal plane crash of General Ziaul Haq, along with the US Ambassador Arnold Raphel and Brigadier General Herbert Wassom shortly after take off from Bahawalpur's military base, changed everything for Benazir.

When she returned to Pakistan, she was received with such warmth and anticipation that it was comparable to the days with her father. A few months later, she stepped into her father's office, as prime minister of Pakistan. Her triumph was dramatic and emotional. "The first woman to lead a Muslim country" announced headlines in the western press. But this was not to be a lasting image. She was young, inexperienced, unprepared and lacked a vision. All she had was her father's legacy. But she quickly lost it.

In August of 1990, President Ghulam Ishaq Khan dismissed her "corrupt" and "inefficient" government. She lost the next elections, only to re-emerge a second time when Ishaq Khan clashed with his own progeny in a war of mutual destruction. It was Nawaz Sharif's downfall that brought Benazir back to power.

But before the next glimpses from Pakistan's luxurious Prime Minister House, there were images of a quick family life: a wedding, a quick succession of children, and finally stories of a husband who would be the chief player in the final downfall.

This time in office she was experienced, but life had taught her to be pragmatic. So she learned the dark art of the kind of diplomacy which rested on lies, compromises and appeasing everyone who was perceived a as possible threat. Her own interior minister would later tell the tale of how a certain maulana from NWFP would periodically arrive in the prime minister's secretariat, have a meeting with the prime minister and leave with a warm pocket, until one day the interior minister told Benazir to hand over the keys of the State Bank to the maulana.

But this was, once again, a shortlived image. The axe fell again, by the hand of a handpicked president who could not tolerate the arrogance, the plunder and the waywardness of the first couple. Then comes the finale. Through a mutually beneficial arrangement, Nawaz Sharif lets Benazir Bhutto leave the country and then passes a verdict against her, thus preventing her return. The nation hears about corruption charges, Swiss accounts, Surrey Palace and a whole range of kickbacks, but nothing is proven. The husband languishes in jail while Benazir Bhutto re-establishes residence in England and finds a new career.

The government there is helpful, to the extent that when one of its own citizens, a certain Paul Keating, files a suit for recovery of his 375,000 pounds in bills for renovations to Surrey Palace, the case is quickly moved to camera. No one is going to hear about the gory details of the plunder of Pakistan's resources. No one is ever going to find out the source of money for the purchase of the stately mansion, nor, for that matter, details of other kickbacks and illegal wealth which she and her husband have reportedly amassed.


 

 

 

  Quantum Note  Jan. 2, 2000

----------------------

Dr. Muzaffar Iqbal

 

A Day in America

 

 

 

It is raining. The green van of the Bayporter shuttle service arrives on time. My luggage is placed in the van and within seconds, we are on our way to San Francisco International Airport. Once out of the city limits, the driver turns on the radio to listen to traffic reports. There are three major and two minor accidents on different highways. The estimated delay time to the airport is ten minutes. I look at my watch; we are still ahead of time. The Bayporter service had already built such delays in their pick up schedule.

 

I look out through the window. The six-lane highway is packed with vehicles cruising at 50 mph. On this cold January morning, millions of vehicles are running on American roads: people rushing to their offices, travelers on the highways, school buses taking young children to schools, hospital vans, post office and courier service vehicles transporting millions of packets across the vast continent.

 

By the end of the day, a staggering number of people, parcels, boxes, letters and vehicles would have moved from one place to another. At least 859 people would have been killed in accidents, another 349 would have been murdered, based on figures from the statistics, one can calculate the victims of arsons, rapes and fires. But these cold statistics hardly provide us an insight into the working of a country which has become the sole arbitrator of  the lives of millions of people in all parts of the world.

 

America has appropriated the role of the sole world power through the use of its economic and technological edge over other countries. A decade ago, shortly after the Gulf War, America had boasted that it had live, real-time communication at the command level. But that was not all. An American General had claimed that by the time they would go to the battlefields the next time, they would have achieved soldier-level, real-time communication. That dream has become reality.

 

After the Gulf War, America has been able to sell its old stock of arms to the Gulf countries. The huge influx of dollars which came with the Gulf war helped to boost the economy and develop a new brand of lethal weapons which surpass all previous models. In a future war, American military experts boast, there will be no parallel to these new weapons.

 

This added muscle has necessitated expansion of espionage and other covert activities. Today’s paper carries a report about the expansion of CIA. George Tenent, CIA’s director, calls it the spy agency’s biggest recruiting drive since the end of the Cold war. A full-page advertisement in the leading journals of the country, call it “the ultimate international career”.

 

The numbers of new recruits are classified but the report in the USA Today (January 18, 2000) goes on to report a 53% increase in recruitment over 1998. In 1998, there was already a 57% increase over the recruitment from 1997.

 

All across America, CIA is attracting young graduates on campuses. The agency’s newspaper and magazine advertisements call Americans with a college degree and an adventurous spirit to apply for a career with CIA which pays handsome salaries and offers unique opportunities of working in all parts of the world. Surely, this is the beginning of appearance of hundreds and thousands of Lawrence of Arabias in the years to come.

 

But most Americans are still oblivious to these “ petty details” of their country’s meddling in the affairs of other nations. Most Americans are not concerned with the fate of their fellow human beings in places which are out of their mental horizon. Most do not know even the approximate location of countries in which American spies and military experts are playing havoc with the lives of innocent people. For a majority of Americans, these places only come to life when their fellow countrymen are taken as hostages or when there are casualties.

 

No doubt, there is a general feeling shared by most Americans that they belong to a mighty power, but newspapers and electronic media is devoid of any references to the military power. What dominates the minds and hearts of most Americans is not their country’s role in the world affairs, nor its military power, but the economic and social issues which affect their daily lives.

 

At the beginning of a new millennium, the American society is facing a crisis whose sheer dimensions and force would tear apart another society: moral and ethical issues which have played havoc with the good old traditions which were once at the heart of family life in this land of opportunity. But it is the remarkable resilience of the American society that, in spite of a very high level of disintegration, it manages to remain intact.

 

It does so, partly, through institutionalizing the process of its moral decay. In 1984, a federal law was passed which forced high schools to allow Christian clubs and prayers in schools. Today, the same law is being used by gay and lesbian groups to secure a place for their own clubs on school campuses. Likewise, through legislation, rights of single parents have been insured. Two brothers in New York have started an Internet company, The Knot Inc., which is championing the cause of gay marriages. There are literally millions of single parents all across America who are raising the next generation of Americans with values which are in stark contrast to those of the founding fathers of this strange and fascinating nation which has become a roaring model for millions of human beings living as far apart as Argentina and Morocco.

 

What is so fascinating about contemporary America is its ability to “absorb” almost every shock. The institutional set up which has given birth to this amazing ability is rooted in a vibrant and ever vigilant doctrine which can be stretched to any limit without fearing a breakdown. Protected against violent and radical changes through a tiered structure, which does not give any single individual extraordinary powers, the system has been functioning with extraordinary success.

 

Just in the past century, the American system has survived the two World Wars, the Great depression of the thirties, the student unrest of the sixties, the Vietnam fiasco and a number of domestic turmoils. Powered by an economy, which has weathered several ups and downs, the system has basically remained intact through successive dilemmas because of its ability to stretch and adopt.

 

This remarkable ability to adjust itself to the changing realities is built into the very working of the system. There are “think tanks” working to ensure the survival of the system. Spread throughout the country, these formal as well as informal think tanks involve some of the best contemporary minds for the process of its regeneration. University faculty members, researchers, corporate executives and business leaders are the backbone of these think tanks. Their involvement in the process of self-criticism and self-analyses produce a body of literature which is not ignored by the government. The politicians listen to these opinions and base their policies on these studies.

 

By now an amazing amount of statistical data has been collected which is used to forecast future trends with remarkable accuracy. No one thinks of fabricating or altering this data. No one tries to hide the unbecoming side of facts; no one is worried about the ugly realities, which the data some times portrays. This honest and analytic approach is perhaps the key to their success.

 

Contemporary America is not the best model human beings have evolved in history. But it is a society, which has managed to remain vibrant and creative. All kinds of ideas emerge rapidly and spontaneously. From genetic engineering to space research, America remains the driving force behind the expansion of frontiers of knowledge. Apart from its moral decadence and uncalled for meddling in the affairs of other nations, American model provides certain basic lessons for the establishment of a system which delivers and which is meant to serve and not rule.

 

 

 

 

 

Quantum Note published in The News International

Friday, February 04, 2000 -- Shawwal 27, 1420 A.H.

www.Jang.com.pk/thenews

 

 

Opinion

 

Dew on sunburnt roses

 

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

The agenda for change has failed to emerge. The euphoria created by the ouster of Mian Nawaz Sharif by the military has quietly disappeared from the national scene and it is business as usual, once again. This is not a hasty judgement, for we are not talking about the actual change but the process of change. It does not take 115 days to start a national debate on the future structure of the governance.

The actual change in the fundamental parameters defining the quality of life in this wonderful land is obviously a slow process. What concerns us is the lack of any genuine effort which would take us toward such a change. The hope that a vigorous national debate will emerge on the crisis of civil society in Pakistan has remained an illusory hope.

The fourth interruption in the affairs of the country by the army in 53 years disrupted the political process, created a vacuum in legal as well as political sense and has now become the defining reality of sorts. There were some fundamental differences in the way the present change came.

This time around, there were no promises of a return to democracy in the proverbial 90-day period. But the raison d'etre of the intervention was none other than a fundamental change in the way government was being run by one man. That fundamental promise had created hopes among the masses. It was this hope that created a tacit approval of the military takeover.

But this hope was like dew on the sunburnt roses; it has rapidly evaporated, leaving behind the scars of 53 years of disillusionments. The agenda for change has failed to emerge because fundamental steps required to generate such an agenda have not been taken. Instead, what we have is a series of orders meant to expedite and legalise ad hoc arrangements and produce quick-fix solutions to grave problems.

This will inevitably lead to further deterioration of the situation. The recent series of bomb blasts is a stern reminder of what lies in store if major initiatives are not taken to build a more cohesive national fabric. No government can hope to rule a society which is fragmenting at its very core. Nations are not built by executive orders. They emerge in an historical context produced by willing participation of the masses.

In Pakistan, the process of nation-building has actually never started. The country emerged, rather suddenly, on the map of the world and was immediately set on a path of internal fragmentation. The 1947 Partition smeared the map of the new country with blood, the scam of property claims dealt the first major blow to its moral fabric and within five years of independence, we were firmly set on a downward spiral which gravitated toward anarchy.

Instead of looking at the deeper causes of this internal collapse, we looked for easy ways to explain national disasters. Thus, for years, we have lived with the cheap slogans, empty rhetorical promises and quick-fix solutions. At another level, easy ways have been found to befool ourselves: The cession of East Pakistan is blamed on General Yahya Khan or ZA Bhutto or Mujeebur Rahman, the collapse of law and order is the result of RAW's activities and so on. These easy but incorrect ways of ascribing national failures on individuals and the ubiquitous "foreign agents" has produced self-defeating mechanisms at the national level.

Thus major blunders have been brushed under the carpet. Hundreds of inquiry commissions and committees established to probe into national disasters have failed to produce a single action to redress the situation. Collected amnesia rules.

In a recent series of articles in The News, retired Air Marshal M Asghar Khan has suggested various fundamental changes in all aspects of national life--from elections to education and from agriculture to the rights of women. But, like so many other voices, his voice has fallen on deaf ears. The hope that a national debate on these fundamental questions will take root as the first and top-most priority of the new government has faded; what is left behind is mere continuation of the old patterns of governance.

The fundamental steps needed to produce a major change in the present system of administration, which was designed by the colonial rulers, does not start or end with the firing of a certain number of officers of this or that corporation. It implies major conceptual changes, built-in accountability, efficiency and, above all, participation of people.

A possible way toward such a change in the context of Pakistan's history is a system which is based on greater involvement of people at the level of villages and district councils. This requires changes in the nature of institutions through constitutional amendments. A genuine process of change will immediately take roots if efforts are made to involve people in the process of decision making about problems which directly concern them. If people were to feel that they are taking charge of their affairs at the basic level, they will immediately get involved. Only through such a process can we hope to regenerate a national cohesiveness so sadly lacking in our country.

Fundamental changes are needed in the way legislation, policy-making, planning and budget-making takes place. Major initiatives are needed to restructure the infrastructure which deals with health, agriculture and education sectors. Institutions such as hospitals, colleges, universities and police require fundamental changes in their operating mechanisms.

The institutions of effective local self-government have never been established in Pakistan. The process of the so-called basic democracy started by Ayub Khan was a scam. Since then, successive governments have merely talked about these changes. And we all know that mere promises do not yield results.

What M Asghar Khan has suggested in his series of articles is a broad outline of a major change. He is perhaps the only person around whose personal integrity is beyond doubt and who has been pondering over these things for years. His somewhat hasty entrance in politics after the arrest of ZA Bhutto at the height of his movement against Ayub Khan, establishment of an unsuccessful political party and subsequent retreat into the quietness of a mountainous home have pushed him into the background, but his ideas need serious attention.

It is ironic that his own son is part of the present setup. If the vision of a fundamental change is as engraved in the mind of the son as it is in the father, we should have seen some steps toward it during the last months. Instead, there have been the usual sycophancies: functions and speeches to "celebrate and honour" the rank, empty rhetorical addresses and the rest.

The return of old faces and old ideas to the forefront has produced a mechanism of its own. The national scene is, once again, dominated by the tiring speeches of various aspirants. The architects of a scam called Vision 2010 are once again writing in the newspapers, those who were fooling the masses with promises have disappeared but promises have stayed behind and have found other tongues.

The present setup is neither the first nor the last imposed on the people of Pakistan. Its inertia, its lack of a genuine fresh start and its own internal disharmony are self-evident realities. But the force of historical process has its own mechanisms; it neither cares for nor waits for individuals. It does, however, honour those who strive to leave an indelible mark on its surface. Such persons are sadly missing from our midst.

 

The News International http://www.jang.com.pk/thenews/index.html

Friday, February 18, 2000 -- Ziqa'ad 11, 1420 A.H.

Opinion

Quantum Note

Collapse of institutions

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

A news item on the National pages of The News, (February 12, 2000), reads: "Nawabshah: The microwave system of the Pakistan Railways has collapsed and most of the stations on the main line have no connection with each other. The collapse has resulted in delay in the movement of trains and non-availability of timings schedule for the railway staff and passengers." It goes on to state that the "Nawabshah station information office has acquired the public address system on rent after the department failed to provide it."

While everyone is busy in forecasting, analysing and expressing opinions about an inconsequential matter which deals with the visit of one Bill Clinton to the subcontinent with a team bent on discovering the "tremendous market" of India, I have chosen this rather mundane news item as a foundation for my column today for two reasons. One, it concerns the railway system which is, or is supposed to be, the backbone of public transport in our country and, two, it shows the initiative of one man to redress a case of institutional failure.

But let me quickly make the point I want to make today: When all is said and done, Pakistan's multiple problems arise from a simple cause--failure to build solid institutions. We started out with institutions left behind by the British and instead of transforming them or evolving new ones, all we have done in the last fifty-two years is to destroy what was bequeathed to us as a legacy of our colonial past. The destruction of these institutions was achieved through a very simple mechanism: They were left to the whims of individuals who were beyond the laws which everyone else was supposed to follow.

This simple mechanism, which put certain individuals beyond any accountability, gave rise to Bhuttos and Nawaz Sharifs who treated the whole country as their personal fief. In addition, it created lesser minions and battalions of sycophants. In due course of time, the institutional structure completely collapsed and the country was left to the whims of the one in the chair. And the chair was up for grabbing by any means available.

Even a cursory analysis of Pakistan's political and social history will be enough to show that this pattern of destruction has been followed by all who came to power. No one in power has shown any interest in building institutions. This is such a pervasive malaise that the cynics allege that it is in the very psyche of our people; that we are inherently incapable of building institutions. That we are a nation which has always looked up to heros, sought messiahs, and is still looking for one.

They claim that the hopes which arise at every change in government are basically hopes for the arrival of a messiah who would deliver us from the decaying process and who would transform the whole society, as if by magic. Now this is a very serious allegation for a people who claim to be Muslim and whose religion forbids and abhors this concept. But let us leave religion aside for a while and look at the allegation that Pakistanis are inherently incapable of building institutions and they have always sought heroes and charismatic leaders.

Our history is replete with instances of this trend. Right from the days of the Pakistan Movement, the nation relied behind individuals rather than institutions. Individuals led, made or destroyed causes, created mass movements and produced major changes. Even children are taught history in a manner which leads them to believe in this magical character of individuals. In answer to the question: "Who created Pakistan?" almost all the textbooks provide a simplistic answer: the Quaid-i-Azam! Political discussions in the press, in public forums, among friends and in social meetings always revolve around individuals. Even national failures, such as the separation of the East wing of the country, are ascribed to individuals. This trend is so obvious that it is impossible to say anything against it.

But a deeper look at this attitude provides a different framework for our discussion. As a people, Pakistanis have had no experience of institutions that work. Psychologically, at least at the personal level, they know individuals count. It is an individual who provides protection, who does or does not clear their application for a phone connection; it is an individual who decides about their income tax and it is not a traffic law, but an individual, who determines whether or not they should be fined for crossing the redlight.

This lack of experiential trust in the working of the institutions is further exasperated by the daily experience of another kind. The students who study hard and who write their exams honestly do not get to the prestigious engineering and medical colleges but those who have other means, find seats in these colleges. The next door neighbour who knows how to deal with the income tax department is not charged any tax while his income is twice as much. The telephone department does not have the cable or the phone sets for an applicant who does not want to bribe but these things appear, as if by magic, for the one who knows how to slip a few bills into the hands of an individual in that same department.

These, and thousands of such daily occurrences, have become built-in realities of contemporary Pakistani society. Sometimes glossed over as "the problem of corruption" the underlying, more serious cause of institutional failure has been never addressed in Pakistan by anyone in a systematic manner. The cynics, who allege that Pakistanis are inherently incapable of building institutions, can only be correct if Pakistanis had any experience of institutions which work. They are not right in their allegation because when these same Pakistanis go to a country where institutions do work, they follow the working of institutions although their past experiences, habits and mode of thinking often lead them to devise ways which try to find a way around the system. Thus some of them end up committing petty crimes, like telephone and traveller cheques frauds.

But these moral crimes are, once again, product of a conditioning which occurs very early in their lives. When my fourteen-year-old nephew tells me that there is no point in his studying hard because in the end it would not amount to anything, he is saying so on the basis of his experience. He has already lost faith in the educational institutions and he has already suffered that tragic loss of innocence which can never be reversed.

But perhaps the real tragedy is that we have even lost the ability to feel this loss. Eleven years ago, when I returned to Pakistan after a decade of absence, I was shocked to see how ten- and twelve-year-olds had no faith left in the institutions. That same generation which has grown up knowing that there are no institutions, no laws and no objective moral standards, is soon going to rule this country. By sheer force of their personal experiences, they will never be able to establish a system based on institutions. They have never known how institutions work.

If we are to stop the process of decay, we need to look into the causes of institutional failure in our society. From political institutions to the educational system and from the institutions which govern public life to those which deal with religion, there is a rampant sense of decay and collapse. It is only through the development of a new trust in the working of our institutions that we can hope to build a society which will have a sense of pride in its own existence.

How can we build that trust? How can we establish institutions which will function according to their rules and function for everyone regardless of his or her social position and relationship to those who hold power? This question should be the foremost concern for anyone interested in rebuilding Pakistan on a solid basis.

 

 

 

Friday, March 03, 2000 -- Ziqa'ad 25, 1420 A.H.

Twenty miles from Pakistan

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

Built on a scale which reminds one of the Mughal dynasties, medieval ages and grand empires, the Presidency recedes into the hills from its imposing front view at the intersection of Constitution Avenue and Jinnah Avenue. Seen from the outside, the building neither inspires admiration, nor awe; it is simply a marble structure with only the reminiscence of power and no character whatsoever.

Since that historic trip to Choti by a man who now faces an uncertain future, the Presidency has lost its pivotal position in the power play. The last man to enjoy and exercise the right of dismissing an elected government has also disappeared from the scene. His decision to pack the chess game of a thoroughly corrupt government had heralded a new era in Pakistan's turbulent history which gave an unprecedented parliamentary majority and almost absolute power to one man who could not handle it and ended up in a small jail in Karachi.

But the building stands and anyone strolling on the broad Constitution Avenue cannot help but look at this grand structure and feel a sense of helpless exasperation at the stature of men who have occupied this grandiose structure. Who were they? What brought them there? What did they do to the country? Where are they now?

But the Presidency is not the only building on Constitution Avenue which evokes these feelings. This avenue is full of such buildings. As one walks on the sidewalk opposite to the Presidency and looks at the marble monsters across the road, they all seem to exist in a foreign land; they all seem to be out of place. The Parliament building is not visible from the road, only its iron gate and the guards can be seen. This is perhaps the only thing that is not out of place. The caged-in building is a good metaphor for Pakistan's political history.

Leaving aside the equally imposing marble structure of the Supreme Court, one comes to a truly palatial building which has yet to emerge as a real structure in the history of the country. This is the Prime Minister's Secretariat which has successfully dodged two successive prime ministers, though both had spent lavishly on its construction and furnishing. The Mughal-style mehrabs, the turban-clad guards and the empty spaces between the white minarets all stand as metaphors of propensity of Pakistan's rulers who have a knack for empty rhetoric.

Next to the Prime Minister's Secretariat, but hidden behind it, is a building which deserved to be on the main boulevard but which has been tucked behind the imposing structures; only a sign stands beside Constitution Avenue, pointing to the presence of Pakistan's National Library. It has taken years for this building to become habitable but even after its completion, it stands aloof, hidden and is inhospitable. There is nothing warm about it. The cold and imposing structure has nothing inviting about it. As one stands facing its broad stairs, one neither sees scholars with loads of books going in and out of the building, nor students in search of knowledge. Only a few guards stand aimlessly.

The cul de sac to the library ends the "Pakistani" part of the avenue on this side; from here to the end of the avenue, there are only the foreign missions, the French School and empty spaces. But it is time to turn around and have a closer look at other side of the avenue which has slowly emerged on the scene and is still in the process of asserting its meagre being compared to the grand buildings which this side faces.

Walking north, one comes across two older buildings, the Foreign Office and Radio Pakistan before a series of newer buildings. The first of these is that of Pakistan Science Foundation. Established to provide a unifying umbrella to the country's numerous science institutions, Pakistan Science Foundation's new building is perhaps the only building on the whole avenue with an aesthetic exterior to it. Its blue tiles, modest yet symmetrical exterior and quietness is in keeping with the traditional designs and historical structures which occupy the vast cultural landscape of Islam's greatest cities.

Next to the Science Foundation, there is a building which has remained under construction for more than a decade and has gained the characteristics of ruins even before its completion: This is supposed to be the building of the Election Commission of Pakistan. The construction history of this building is truly amazing.

I used to look at this humble structure when it was trying to raise itself above ground. At one time, it seemed that it would quickly soar high above the other buildings on this grand avenue. Workers worked, machines churned out concrete and iron beams went up. But it was an illusion. That hyper activity must have been the result of a closing date for a cheque clearance for the contractor. Because after that short spell, nothing happened for months.

The building has been in the making for years. Does it need to be completed? With no elections on the horizon, there seems to be no need for its existence! But the unfinished cement blocks, the iron bars sticking out of the columns and beams, the empty holes for the windows and the characteristic odour of ruins are there for everyone to see.

Next to this building in ruins is a strange combination of two buildings. One of these used to be an unassuming simple structure with weeping walls, run down windows and unkept lawns with a small board which read: Pakistan Academy of Sciences. The other one was not there at all. In its place, there used to be just wild grass. But all of this has changed during the last two years.

The unassuming building in need of repair has been given a new look with columns and arches and the tall grass has given way to a building which seems to come out of E-7, the posh residential area of the city. The old structure is still undergoing changes and one day it might become as pretentious as the buildings on the other side of the boulevard. The new structure, the guest house of the Academy of Sciences, is still to find its character.

Further north stand two more government buildings, both similar in their exterior to the building of the Pakistan Science Foundation. Occupied by those who control the financial strings of the country, these buildings with their blue and white colours add to the same sense of historicity as that of the Pakistan Science Foundation.Perhaps the famous epithet about Islamabad--a city situated twenty miles from Pakistan--applies to Constitution Avenue more than any other place in the country.

 

 

Friday, March 17, 2000 -- Zil'Haj 10, 1420 A.H.

The last pilgrimage

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

It was a glorious Thursday. The date was May 28, 632 (Rabi ul-awwal 12, 11 Hijri). It was also a sad day for the Muslim community, for on this day, the Prophet of Islam departed from this world. But it was a glorious day in the sense that with the departure of the Prophet from this world, the final phase of the cycle commenced. In this final phase of the human cycle, no prophet will come and Allah has completed His religion for all humanity until the Day of Resurrection.

The mission of the Prophet had come to a successful conclusion three months before his death. The Qur'aan has affirmed this: "This day the disbelievers despair of prevailing against your religion, so fear them not, but fear Me. This day I have perfected your religion and fulfilled My favour unto you, and it hath been My good pleasure to choose Islam for you as your religion" (5:3).

This ayah was revealed on the ninth day of Zilhaj, in the tenth year after Hijrah, after a supplication from the Prophet while he was sitting on his camel, Qaswa. It was the same camel on which he had migrated from Makkah; the camel was now standing on a hill, Jabal al-Rahmah, Mount of Mercy, in the valley of Arafah about thirteen miles east of Makkah.

The Prophet had arrived in the plain of Arafah a few hours before after spending a night in the valley of Mina. He was accompanied by companions who had travelled with him from Madinah or who had joined him on the way to this extraordinary gathering.

Earlier on that historical day, the Prophet had sent a young man, Rabi'ah bin Ummayya bin Khalf, on an errand. He was to approach every member of the congregation and ask three questions on his behalf and proclaim an article of the constitution which he was going to unveil on that glorious afternoon of the consecrated day of Arafah in the tenth year of Hijra.

Obeying the Prophet's instructions, Rabi'ah bin Ummayya managed to contact every member of the assembly; they were sitting in groups. He went to the first group and said:

"Say, O, People, the Messenger of Allah asks: What month is this?"

When he received no answer, he said:

"The holy month (as-Shahar al-Haraam)," he said, the Messenger of Allah says: 'Allah has made inviolable for you each other's blood and your property until you meet your Lord, just like He has made inviolable this your month.'"

Then he asked the second question:

"Say, O, People, the messenger of Allah asks: 'What land is this?'"

Again he received no answer.

"The holy land (al-Balad al-Haraam)", he said, [the Messenger of Allah says:] 'Allah has made inviolable for you each other's blood and your property until you meet your Lord, just like He has made inviolable this your land.'"

Finally he asked the third question: "Say, O, People, the Messenger of Allah asks: 'What day is this?'"

When he received no answer, he said, "al-Yowmal Hajj al-Akbar", the Day of the Great Pilgrimage, "[the Messenger of Allah says:] 'Allah has made inviolable for you each other's blood and your property until you meet your Lord, just like He has made inviolable this your Day.'"

When the sun had passed its zenith, the Prophet sat on

, and began his sermon by praising Allah, as was his custom. The members of that historic gathering were seated on the sand on the slope of the hill and the words of the Prophet were repeated by criers from point to point throughout the whole assembly until they reached the farthest listener. Starting with the first, each crier identified himself, repeated the name of the previous crier along with his lineage, and the chain went on increasing. The first crier had a strong voice. He heard the words directly from the lips of the Prophet.

His usual opening words, Al-Hamdo Lil'Alllah, not only brought everyone to attention but also brought the Prophet nearer to the close of his mission. A brief pause followed the praise, then the Prophet said:

"O' People! Listen to my words for I do not know whether I shall meet you again on such an occasion ever after.

"O' People, your lives and your property shall be inviolable until you meet your Lord, just like this inviolable day and month. Surely you are going to meet your Lord and He will ask you about your deeds, so I convey [this] to you. Whoever is keeping a trust of someone else, shall return that trust to its rightful owner. All interest obligations (riba) shall henceforth be annulled; your capital is, however, yours to keep, you will neither do wrong nor be wronged; Allah has decided that there shall be no usury and all interest due to Abbas bin Abdul Muttalib is henceforth annulled; every right arising out of homicide in the pre-Islamic era (Jahilliah) is henceforth annulled; and the first such right that I annul is the one arising from the murder of Rabiah bin al-Harith bin Abdul Muttalib

"Reason well O' People and hark to my words which I now convey to you. I am leaving with you the Book of Allah and the way (Sunnah) of his Prophet (Nabi) if you hold fast to these, you will never go astray."

The Prophet concluded the sermon by asking the members of the congregation whether he had conveyed Allah's message or not. The congregation responded in affirmative and the Prophet said: "O Allah, be my witness."

This extraordinary proclamation, which ended by making Allah a witness, not only delivered the first complete constitution in the history of constitutions, it also initiated its implementation. The Prophet set the example by annulling the blood revenge and interest of members of his own tribe, the Quraysh.

This farewell sermon of the Prophet contains, in an extremely condensed form, seeds which later flourished and developed into a highly elaborate system of thought rooted in the unity of Creator, fraternity of mankind and social justice. It declared that all beings were children of Adam and Adam was created from clay. This biological unity of mankind was further emphasised at the moral and ethical levels by proclaiming that neither the black has any superiority over the white, nor an Arab over an ajami and vice versa. All human beings are equal before the sight of the Creator and the only criteria for superiority is piety.

The farewell sermon of the Prophet is one of the most important documents in the history of mankind and it has remained to this day a source of inspiration for countless Muslims. The succinct declaration is a charter of rights and obligations at two levels: It provides the spiritual, legal and moral framework for human rights and it sets out fundamental guidelines for the rights and duties of man toward his fellow human beings.

Preserved over the centuries through a chain of transmission, which is fascinatingly unique in its construction and perpetuation, this fundamental charter of human rights has tremendous relevance to Pakistan's multi-racial, multi-lingual society. If implemented, it will produce a polity which will be rooted in equality based of moral character and values and not on the basis of blood relations or tribal affiliations.

An important part of the implementation of this charter of rights was its immediate and complete enforcement, starting from the family of the Prophet. Note that he did not wait; he did not merely ask others to follow what he had proclaimed. By annulling the interest owed to his uncle and by repudiating the blood claim of his own relatives, the Prophet set an example and a procedure which is the key to any reform process: start immediately and from your own household. How many of us are willing to follow this today?

 

 

Friday, March 31, 2000 -- Zil'Haj 24, 1420 A.H.

Haj year 2000

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

We had gathered from all corners of the world. Thousands upon thousands. Men, women, children, old, young, strong and weak. Responding to the urgent invitation, we all submitted: "Here I am, Here I am O, Lord, Here I am, there is no deity except You, Surely all praise belongs to You and all favours and the Kingdom, You have no partner."

It had been weeks and months of waiting and suddenly we were at the outskirts of the Holy Land. From the moment of arrival to the moment of departure, each one of us was going experience a unique set of events that would become our Haj experience. I have chosen to devote this column to one aspect of this Haj because that level of experience is related to the social and political life of Muslim ummah.

This level of experience starts at the port of entry where hundreds and thousands of human beings encounter a series of obstacles, they are forced to stand in lines and go through a humiliating process that treats them as criminals. At this level of Haj experience, one goes through such an intense mental suffering that virtually every one breaks down. This is how it starts.

For the airborne pilgrims, the entrance to the country is restricted to two ports: Jeddah and Madinah. Once you arrive, you are quickly ushered into a waiting area, enclosed with iron grills and manned by guards who look at you as if you were about to run away from a concentration camp. After a waiting period that ranges from two to eight hours, you are hurled into a queue with a lot of shouting and pushing. The queue moves incredibly slowly because the young immigration personnel at the booths have no intention of processing the pilgrims' entrance; they smoke cigarettes, they joke with each other, they look around, and once you arrive at their counter, they stare at you and your passport for what seems to be eternity before stamping the passport.

But this is not all. With the stamped document in our hands, we were ushered into another queue that stood in front of a large room where the workers of the so-called mualam were taking the passports. This was the first place where passports and nationalities became the defining factor. This was to remain so for the rest of our stay in the country. Those of us who had come from the West were assigned a mualam who was designated by a number "20". We handed our bank drafts to the worker who stuffed our passports with a few papers and a handful of machine readable barcode numbers and stapled everything to the passport at four places.

Next came the customs officials, where most of the fellow pilgrims from Asia and Southeast Asia received their major shock: their suitcases and handbags were dumped on the counter, in some cases, they were ripped open with knives, they were scorned and their protests were totally ignored.

After the customs, one came to a large area where loudspeakers and megaphones made all kinds of announcements. The area was divided into "Haj centers" for various countries and once again one went through the painful realisation that an ummah which was supposed to be united on the basis of divine message has been badly divided on national and racial lines.

We had intended to go to Madinah first. But we were not allowed to go out of the enclosed zone. One could leave the cordoned area only by official buses that had ceased to run after sunset. "The only way to go to Madinah is by air," we were told. We rushed to the Saudi Airline office in the same enclosed area where several hundred people were standing in front of the small windows most of which were closed. No one was telling anything about the flight schedule; there were no signs, no announcements. Those who could make it to the window found no-one sitting at the seat. There were people inside but they were not interested in answering queries.

After about an hour, we found out that there are no more flights going to Madinah! "But may be there will be one flight after midnight." We had arrived at the airport at 5:20 pm and now it was 10 pm. We had not put on Ihrams with the intention of visiting the Prophet's city first and returning from there to perform Haj Qiran. We really had to go to Madinah. We hung around. While waiting, we met our friends who had missed their flight to Madinah due to the long queues at the immigration counters and who were in the same situation. We decided to wait it out.

At three in the morning, three women in our group were able to get tickets for the unscheduled flight that was leaving in ten minutes. We rushed to the departure terminal that proved to be a short hallway. We formed a queue and somewhere along the line, someone took our passports and threw them in a basket that was being carried along the line.

We arrived in Madinah and it took us another two hours to get to the hotel. My favourite city had transformed into a place filled with sick and tired pilgrims who were in a high state of anxiety. The Mosque, which had been my refuge for a month three years ago, was now a place filled with pilgrims who crowded around the shrine of the Prophet, guards who yelled at the pilgrims, young, strong men who pushed their way through the crowd and the most painful background noise of sore throats and coughing during prayers.

No-one had told us anything but after going from office to office, we figured out that the last day to go back to Makkah was not the 7th of Dhu'l Haj, which was our plan but the 5th. And we had to go to an office 24 hours in advance to inform the people there who would then send the passport to the bus terminal (or the airport).

On the day of our departure from Madinah, we put on Ihrams and arrived at the bus terminal after Fajr as we were told. But it was full four hours before the bus moved! I watched the slow movement of the passports from one window to another and finally they were sealed in a bag and handed over to the driver.

But the driver was in no rush to reach Makkah. He made three long stops for drinking tea and smoking cigarettes while the pilgrims said their prayers or ate at dirty, wayside restaurants. These wayside stops had run down mosques, with no toilet or ablution facilities.

Thirteen hours after leaving our hotel in Madinah, we arrived at the outskirts of Makkah. (The journey normally takes five hours.) The bus stopped at a checkpost where the bag with the passports was handed to a young fellow who rode the bus to the office of the mualam in Makkah. Here our passports were taken and we were handed coded wristband; from now on, we were pilgrims with no name but a number.

The sight of the House of God made us forget everything. It was the 6th of Dhu'l Haj. Almost two million pilgrims had gathered at the House of God built by Allah's friend Ibrahim who had prayed to God: "O my Lord, I have settled some of my offspring in a barren valley near Your Sacred House, so that they may observe true worship."

It was time to forget everything: the long waits were over. We were faced to face with the Holy House. Thousands and thousands of pilgrims were going round and round the House, clad in black. We joined the crowd and went around, calling and supplicating to the Lord Who had granted us the opportunity to be there out of His infinite Mercy.

 

Friday, April 14, 2000 -- Muharram 8, 1421 A.H.

Another political void

Dr Muzaffar Iqbal

Six months after the historic October 12 day, we are in the midst of a political void. The law of necessity had demanded the creation of this void, expediency had required the removal of all political elements from the scene, and instinct of survival had dictated the mechanisms. The end result: a perfect state of political void. But what next?

The euphoria created by the military takeover has died down. Those who had pinned their hopes for a basic change have lost their hopes; those who were sceptical have become cynical and those who had been watching from the sidelines have decided that it is "business as usual". But where does it lead the nation?

Pakistan's political history shows that political vacuum always leads to the emergence or creation of new political entities. Ayub Khan created a political vacuum through various decrees. Then he tried to fill it with handpicked members of his basic democracy scheme. He failed. Masses rallied behind Fatima Jinnah. The state machinery crushed that wonderfully upright and matchless lady. Then came the torrential current: ZA Bhutto and Mujibur Rahman pulled the rug and folded the rule of the field marshal, at the height of his self-created illusion of a 'Green Revolution'.

The price was high. Very high: Months of unrest, strikes, closure of factories, disruption of the education system and the collapse of industry. The country was rent asunder. The aftermath of the fall of Ayub's regime led to civil war in East Pakistan and finally to the breakup of the country.

Then came the strange and turbulent era of ZA Bhutto. With his rise, the speed of change increased dramatically. He was indeed a vibrant person who could not rest; who could not fathom his own greatness. A person who could not live up to the great expectations he himself had created. All through his turbulent rule, there was a clamour of new policies. From education to health-care and from energy to industry, everything was to be operated on a new basis. In fact, ZA Bhutto constantly talked about a new Pakistan.

But while he talked about creating a new Pakistan, all he could do was create a new political void, albeit of a new kind. He just could not live with the opposition. So he eliminated it. One by one, he dealt fatal blows to his political rivals. Some were kidnapped and beaten into submission. Others were forced to give up politics. Some died natural deaths. And still others were physically removed from the scene. So he paid the price.

The violent summer of 1977 not only saw Bhutto's fall, it also witnessed the emergence of yet another new political void. That was the summer during which the balloon of Islamisation was hoisted, prematurely, and generated false hopes. These hopes were destined to end up in smoke. But there were ten long years between that turbulent summer of 1977 and the fatal crash over Bahawalpur which killed General Zia. Nevertheless, General Ziaul Haq was much more successful in the creation of a new political vacuum than any of his predecessors. Within two years, he had eliminated his formidable rival, established himself as the sole authority in the country and removed all those who could challenge his rule. This he did through a combination of political intrigues, instinctive survival skills and strategy. He managed to create a counter-balance to any political threats. His methodology was simple: He gave birth to the MQM and the Sharif dynasty and brought them to the centrestage.

If Pakistan's history is any guide, we can be sure that no-one will ever know what happened to the plane which went up in smoke over Bahawalpur. But we all know that the sudden disappearance of the general from the scene was nothing but miraculous for the erstwhile 'Daughter of the East'. She came, she saw and she conquered. But only to desecrate the very memory of her father. She came only to usher us into another dark era of despondent and characterless sycophants. Some would say she came only to take revenge.

Whatever her motives might have been, one thing is clear. She failed to realise that she was merely harvesting the fruit of her father's labours. She was brought to power because of a vacuum which yearned to be filled. When she failed, the same political void which had been bred over the long years of General Zia's rule also provided an opportunity to the Sharif dynasty. And the Sharifs failed, leading to another political void.

It remains to be seen what the current political void would produce. But there are already clear signs that we are once again back to square one. Just like 1958 and subsequent overthrows of the political system, we are being told that there is a need for cleanup. That once the cleanup operation is finished, everything will be alright. The whole complexity of Pakistan's numerous problems has gone, once again, through a mysterious reductive operation and the remainder is the same as before: let me clean up the mess and then we will restart the process and everything will be alright. Once again, the name of the game is "new policies". Once again, the national scene is